West Side Presbyterian Church
Seattle, Washington


The Da Vinci Code -- Unbelievable!

A message from Paul Smith, Pastor

OK, so this is old news, but it just won't go away! Dan Brown's clever book of fiction, The Da Vinci Code has been at the top of the charts for two years and sold more than 10,000,000 copies. The question is, "Why?” It's a reasonably good "page turner" with a rather silly ending, which has been circulating around in the cult-like underworld of religious fiction for years. Hundreds of "facts" quoted in the book are pure fiction that a middle school pupil could uncover in a brief term paper. So why has it been so outrageously popular?

When Carreen and I were in Paris on our way home from Chad, we visited the Louvre and tagged along with a guide who was reading scornfully from the book while pointing out particular paintings and explaining why Brown's comments about them were absurd. This past month I listened to Dr. N.T. Wright, a noted British scholar, laugh his way through a score of utter inaccuracies about Westminster Abbey which Brown solemnly sets forth in support of his wild theory of a conspiracy to suppress the "real story" about Jesus and his sexual liaison with Mary Magdalene. So why has a book which is clearly a very careless fiction been so earnestly discussed? Why have so many concluded that the book effectively discredits the Christian faith?

"The real question is: Why do people want to believe The Da Vinci Code?"

Yes, it's fiction, but Brown purposely leaves you with the impression that real scholarship has determined that the Catholic church has been ruthlessly suppressing the truth about the New Testament that in fact there were hundreds of other documents like the Dead Sea scrolls, the Nag Hammadi codices, and the Gospel of Thomas which were earlier than the four gospels and tell an entirely different story of Jesus. The actual fact is that the Dead Sea scrolls never mention Jesus at all, and the four gospels have been determined by objective scholarship to be 100-150 years earlier than the other documents, include eyewitness accounts, and are far more objective. The four gospels tell a story and let you draw your own conclusions from it. The other (Gnostic) writings are collections of sayings and fragments of philosophy written not at the time of Jesus, but centuries later in support of a particular philosophy. The simplest scholar would be able to see through this deception and draw the conclusion that the gospels were far more accurate, whether he or she believed their conclusions or not.

There is much more that could be said here, including the blatant fact that the Roman Empire would not have persecuted a sect that believed the harmless, fringe doctrines of the Gnostics. What they viciously persecuted was a sect that stated flatly that Jesus had risen from the dead and was therefore Lord of the universe, and represented an authority higher than the Emperor! That was revolutionary!

So why do people still believe The Da Vinci Code? That question is actually absurd. It would be impossible to look at the facts and believe The Da Vinci Code. The real question is: Why do people want to believe The Da Vinci Code? And once we have determined what the real question is, the answer is obvious. You can't believe it based on any facts known to scholarship. You can only choose to believe it because it provides a convenient justification for discarding the Christian faith.

You understand, as long as you know that somewhere along the line you may actually have to give an account of your life before a living God, you cannot be completely comfortable with pursuing your own self-indulgent lifestyle. Only if you can dismiss the Christian faith out-of-hand are you free to worship yourself, which is what contemporary "spirituality" is all about.

camera -- movie reviewsBook and Movie Review by Jay Maurer

It’s hard not to have noticed all the hoopla surrounding The Da Vinci Code; the novel has been prominent for the last three years or so, and the movie was recently released. I thought it would be interesting to review both the book and the movie in order to understand the movie’s impact. Here are some comments about the two. I’ve attempted to focus on points other than those from Christianity Today printed in the West Side Bulletin and on the website. More...


5 Big Questions from The Da Vinci Code -- a brief guide
by Christianity Today magazine Associate Editor Collin Hansen

Already an international publishing sensation, The Da Vinci Code now is a feature film directed by Ron Howard and starring Tom Hanks. The compelling story written by Dan Brown blurs the line between fact and fiction, so moviegoers have joined readers wondering about the origins and legitimacy of orthodox Christianity. This guide offers brief answers to five important questions.

1. Was Jesus married to Mary Magdalene?
No. Mary Magdalene was certainly close to Jesus. She wept at Jesus' tomb (John 20). Jesus even entrusted her to return and tell the disciples about his resurrection. But we have no reason to believe they were married. Brown says that Leonardo da Vinci's Last Supper reveals the secret. He writes that the figure to Jesus' right, traditionally known as the apostle John, is actually Mary. Not true. Artists often gave characters feminine features to portray youth. John was the youngest of the disciples.

Brown correctly observes that few Jewish men of Jesus' day did not marry. But why, then, did the apostle Paul, himself celibate, not mention Jesus and Mary when he argued that apostles could marry (1 Cor. 9:5)?

2. What about these alternative gospels that aren't in the New Testament?
It's true that the Bible did not arrive as a "fax from heaven," as Brown writes. The New Testament canon in its current form was first formally attested in 367. Nevertheless, church leaders applied important standards when compiling the Bible. Authors of accepted writings needed to have walked and talked with Jesus, or at least with his leading disciples. Their teaching could not contradict what other apostles had written, and their documents must have been accepted by the entire church, from Jerusalem to Rome. Church leaders considered earlier letters and reports more credible than later documents. Finally, they prayed and trusted the Holy Spirit to guide their decisions.

The so-called Gnostic gospels, many discovered just last century, did not meet these criteria. Many appeared much later than the Bible and were dubiously attributed to major Christian leaders. Their teachings contrasted with what apostles like Paul had written. For example, many Gnostic writings argued that Jesus did not appear in the flesh, because flesh is evil, or they rejected the Old Testament.

3. Were there really competing Christianities during the early church?
Yes—in the sense there were many disputes about the nature of Jesus. And the church has done its best to vanquish challengers to orthodoxy. Once the church decided against the Gnostic writings, they gathered and burned all the Gnostic manuscripts they could find.

Later church councils convened to discuss other threats to Christian orthodoxy. Constantine, the first Roman emperor to make Christianity legal, called the most important of these meetings in 325. Leaders from around the Christian world gathered in Nicea, where they debated Arianism, which taught that God created Jesus. Brown writes that Constantine called this council so he could introduce a new divine Jesus on par with the Father. On the contrary, documents from before Nicea show that most followers of Jesus already called him LORD, the Yahweh of the Old Testament. The church leaders at Nicea rejected Arianism and affirmed that God and Jesus existed together from the beginning in the Trinity. This council produced the first drafts of what became the Nicene Creed, a landmark explanation of Christian belief.

4. What is Opus Dei?
A conservative religious group within the Roman Catholic Church. Opus Dei urges priests and laypeople to strenuously pursue sanctification through everyday discipline. The group has taken criticism for its conservative views, zeal, and secretive practices. There is no evidence that Opus Dei has resorted to murder; nor has the Vatican entrusted Opus Dei to violently guard the church's deepest secrets, as Dan Brown claims in The Da Vinci Code.

5. Does the Priory of Sion really exist?
Yes, but not as described by Brown. Researchers suspect that members of the real-life Priory of Sion, founded in 1956, forged documents that placed major historical figures—such as Isaac Newton and Leonard da Vinci—in an ancient secret society. There is no evidence for this group beyond dubious documents. Any story relating this group to a dynasty begun by Jesus and Mary Magdalene is a fanciful work of fiction.

Collin Hansen is associate editor of Christianity Today (www.christianitytoday.com). For more Christianity Today coverage, visit www.ChristianityToday.com/go/DaVinci